Optimize RAF with the Right Clinical Documentation for Risk Adjustment – Part 8
This compares two simulated patients with similar complexities but different disease conditions to demonstrate how accurate clinical documentation impacts Risk Adjustment Factor (RAF) scores and potential Medicare Advantage (MA) payments. This is intended for CDI educational purposes only and illustrates how variations in disease conditions can affect RAF scores and corresponding MA payments.
Patient 1:
Assessment says a 83-year-old male patient with CKD 4 due to Diabetes, Anemia unspecified.
| Category/ ICD10 | Diagnosis Description | CMS-HCC-V24 | CMS-HCC-V28 | CY2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raf Score | MA Payment | ||||
| Demographic | - | - | - | 0.566 | $5698.01 |
| Diagnosis | |||||
| E1122 | Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease | HCC 18 | HCC 37 | 0.211 | $2090.31 |
| N184 | Chronic kidney disease, stage 4 (severe) | HCC 137 | - | 0.440 | $4475.54 |
| D649 | Anemia, unspecified (Non-HCC ICD10 Code) |
- | - | - | - |
| Grand Total | - | - | - | 1.217 | $12263.87 |
Note: The Date of Service (DOS) is assumed to be in 2024, so the RAF scores are blended using both V24 and V28 models.
Patient 2:
Assessment says a 83-year-old male patient with CKD 4 due to Diabetes, On Dialysis, Had one kidney transplanted last year, Anemia due to CKD.
| Category/ ICD10 | Diagnosis Description | CMS-HCC-V24 | CMS-HCC-V28 | CY2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raf Score | MA Payment | ||||
| Demographic | - | - | - | 0.566 | $5698.01 |
| Diagnosis | |||||
| E1122 | Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease | HCC 18 | HCC 37 | 0.211 | $2090.31 |
| N186 | End stage renal disease | HCC 136 | HCC 326 | 0.546 | $5680.20 |
| D631 | Anemia in chronic kidney disease (Non-HCC ICD10 Code) |
- | - | - | - |
| Z992 | Dependence on renal dialysis | HCC 134 | - | 0.144 | $1344.42 |
| Z940 | Kidney transplant status (Non-HCC ICD10 Code) |
- | - | - | - |
| Grand Total | - | - | - | 1.467 | $14812.94 |
Note: The Date of Service (DOS) is assumed to be in 2024, so the RAF scores are blended using both V24 and V28 models.
Comparison of Patient 1 and 2:
| Patient 1 | Patient 2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| CKD 4 due to Diabetes | CKD 6 due to Diabetes | Stage is higher in the second patient |
| Not on Dialysis | On Dialysis | Dialysis status related to CKD is added in patient 2, Change in RAF score |
| No kidney transplant | Had one kidney transplanted | Transplant status related to CKD is added in patient 2, but no change in RAF score |
| Anemia unspecified | Anemia due to CKD | Cause for anemia is documented in patient 2, but no change in RAF score |
Patient 1 has a RAF score of 1.217, while Patient 2 has a RAF score of 1.467
Patient 1 had an RAF score of 1.217, while Patient 2 had an RAF score of 1.467. The higher score for Patient 2 was influenced by stage 6 CKD and dialysis. Despite similar complexity, differences in diagnoses led to varying RAF scores. Patient 1’s RAF score of 1.217 corresponded to an annual Medicare Advantage member payment of $12,263.87, while Patient 2’s score of 1.467 resulted in a payment of $14,812.94.
Precise documentation of disease stage, associated diagnostic details, and acknowledgment of the physician’s role in managing chronic conditions or complex populations remain critical.
Patient 1 had an RAF score of 1.217, while Patient 2 had an RAF score of 1.467. The higher score for Patient 2 was influenced by stage 6 CKD and dialysis. Despite similar complexity, differences in diagnoses led to varying RAF scores. Patient 1’s RAF score of 1.217 corresponded to an annual Medicare Advantage member payment of $12,263.87, while Patient 2’s score of 1.467 resulted in a payment of $14,812.94.
Precise documentation of disease stage, associated diagnostic details, and acknowledgment of the physician’s role in managing chronic conditions or complex populations remain critical.
Note: Prior to documenting any diagnosis, physician should assess/evaluate and confirm it during the patient's visit. Unsupported diagnoses in documentation will not be upheld during an audit.