Comparative Analysis Tool for CMS-HCC RAF Scores Version 24 and Version 28 Click to edit
Comparative Analysis Tool for CMS-HCC RAF Scores Version 24 and Version 28
S.No ICD 10 CM Code CMS-HCC-V24 CMS-HCC-V28 Diagnosis Description Delete Record
Category CMS-HCC-V24 CMS-HCC-V28
RAF Score MA Payment RAF Score MA Payment

Navigating the Transition: Unraveling the Significance of Comparing RAF Score v24 and v28

The healthcare landscape is on the brink of a significant transformation with the phased transition from RAF Score v24 to v28 in CMS HCC model. Understanding the intricacies of these versions and their implications is crucial for healthcare organizations, payers, and providers seeking accurate risk assessments and seamless transitions.

RAF Score v28: A New Horizon in Risk Adjustment

RAF Score v28 represents more than just an update; it symbolizes a fundamental shift in how health plans manage risk and evaluate patient populations. Anticipated to decrease Medicare Advantage risk scores by 3% to 8%, this version introduces changes with far-reaching consequences for revenue, care planning, and strategic direction.

Transitioning Timeline: Decoding the Phased Shift

The transition timeline from v24 to v28 is a meticulous process. In 2023, v24 holds a 67% weight, with v28 at 33%. This balance shifts substantially in 2024, with v28 taking a dominant 67%, and by 2025, v28 reigns supreme at 100%.

Why Early Transition Matters: Navigating the Change Landscape

Early adoption is imperative for several reasons:

Accuracy and Compliance:

Early transition ensures accurate risk assessment, aligning with regulatory requirements and minimizing compliance-related risks.

Strategic Planning:

Health plans can proactively plan for the expected decrease in revenue, allowing for strategic financial sustainability initiatives.

Operational Efficiency:

A seamless transition minimizes operational disruptions, enabling health plans to maintain focus on patient care and value-based partnerships.

Competitive Advantage:

Early adopters gain a competitive edge, adapting to the new model's requirements and potentially outperforming competitors.

Improved Patient Outcomes:

Early transition facilitates more accurate risk assessment, leading to better patient care planning and improved health outcomes.

How to Begin Transitioning: Key Features of an Adaptive Analytics Tool

Whether in the early stages of transition or yet to commence, leveraging a flexible analytics tool is crucial. The ideal tool should offer:

Comprehensive v28 Model Analysis:

Detailed insights into how the v28 model impacts organizations, empowering strategic decision-making and risk adjustment optimization.

Seamless Transition:

User-friendly analytics platforms that simplify the transition process, ensuring minimal disruption and a smooth shift to the blended model.

Revenue Optimization:

Tools that maximize revenue capture under the v28 model, aligning financial strategies for peak profitability.

Proactive Risk Adjustment:

Technology enabling prospectively planned care programs by analyzing risk scores and RAF opportunities for precise member demographics and timely interventions.

The Key Changes: Unraveling the Transformation from v24 to v28

The shift from v24 to v28 introduces crucial alterations:

Increased HCC Categories:

The number rises from 86 to 115, with categories renumbered.

Elimination and Renumbering:

Some categories are eliminated entirely, and renumbering occurs.

Coding Structure Change:

v28 uses the structure of ICD-10-CM codes, departing from the previous use of ICD-9-CM codes.

Impact on Diabetes Coding:

Diabetes values decrease in v28, with some categories no longer mapping to a risk score.

Constraining HCCs:

v28 employs constraining, meaning related HCCs receive the same coefficients.

Understanding these changes is pivotal for healthcare stakeholders navigating the transition. It not only ensures compliance but positions organizations strategically in a rapidly evolving healthcare landscape. The ongoing comparison of RAF Score v24 and v28 during this transition period is instrumental for healthcare payors and providers, fostering informed decision-making, accurate risk assessments, and optimal patient outcomes. As the industry embraces this paradigm shift, finding strategic partners equipped with adaptable analytics becomes paramount to master the v28 model successfully.

Demographic Inputs
Risk Model
Risk Factor